As the new home of OSPIRG's environmental work, Environment Oregon can be contacted regarding this article.Gov.
Ted Kulongoski on Monday put Oregon on the road to cleaner-burning
vehicles -- and a clash with the auto industry -- by ordering stiffer
pollution controls for new cars sold in the state after 2008.
The
governor ordered the state Environmental Quality Commission to draft
regulations enacting California's new emissions controls. Those are
aimed at reducing carbon-dioxide emissions that are thought to
contribute to global warming.
Kulongoski
also vetoed a provision in the Department of Environmental Quality
budget that bars the agency from working on the new emissions rules.
That budget note was inserted by the 2005 Legislature at the automobile
industry's behest.
"Oregon
should be a national leader by combatting global warming," Kulongoski
said at a campaign-style event at Portland's Pioneer Courthouse Square.
"I intend for Oregon to add stricter tailpipe standards for emissions
this year, by administrative rule."
A
bill requiring the stiffer rules went nowhere in the 2005 legislative
session. When the governor suggested that he could adopt the rules
administratively via the Environmental Quality Commission, House
Republicans pushed through a budget note to forestall that. The
Legislature's lawyer suggested that the note was unconstitutional, but
Kulongoski made a legal challenge moot by vetoing it.
Environmentalists praised the governor's actions, and critics said he was picking a fight with the auto industry.
Six
companies that make cars and trucks already have sued in federal court
to prevent California from imposing the new rules, which take effect
for 2009 model-year vehicles introduced in 2008.
"I
know if we adopt the rules, the same thing's going to happen in
Oregon," said Darrell Fuller, a lobbyist for the Oregon Automobile
Dealers Association.
Under
the federal Clean Air Act, California alone has the right to enact
stricter vehicle-emission standards than the federal government.
However, other states may adopt the California standards if they choose
to go beyond federal regulations.
The
Washington Legislature earlier adopted the California standards, but
only on the condition that Oregon did so. Oregon and Washington now
stand to become the ninth and 10th states adopting the California
standards, along with similar provisions enacted by Canada.
A
market that large for cleaner-burning vehicles should spark
improvements in cars and trucks sold nationally, environmentalists said.
"It
costs automakers more to make two types of cars instead of one," said
Isaac Silverman of Oregon State Public Interest Research Group, known
as OSPIRG.
"Oregon's
joining a handful of states in really leading the way to addressing an
environmental threat," said Fred Heutte, a member of the Sierra Club's
National Global Warming and Energy Committee.
Gains
in emissions reduction come largely by making engines burn fuel more
efficiently. As a result, the tougher emissions standards will boost
fuel efficiency as well.
It
makes "economic sense to all parties," said Angus Duncan, a member of
the Governor's Advisory Group on Global Warming. The
Kulongoski-appointed group issued a report with 60 recommendations in
the spring.
The
recommendation to adopt California vehicle emissions standards was one
of the easiest to reach consensus on, Duncan said, because consumers
will save money by using less gasoline.
Al
Jubitz, a former truckstop owner and member of the governor's panel,
said there is an "action gap" when it comes to what is known about
global warming and what is done about it.
"I
commend the governor for doing what the Legislature did not, and
Congress has not," Jubitz said. "I commend you, governor, for helping
to close the action gap."
Fuller
said the California standards will add $1,000 to $3,000 to the price of
a car. They also will bar sales of diesel-fueled passenger cars and
trucks in Oregon, he said. In addition, Fuller said, dealers might be
forced to sell more hybrids and limit the supply of sport utility
vehicles and other large cars demanded by consumers.
"You
can't have diesel cars and trucks in California," Fuller said. "People
in Oregon need trucks and SUVs because of our lifestyle."
It's
true that newer-model diesel Volkswagen Jettas, Passats and Mercedes E
class cannot meet California standards, said Rachel Sakata, an
air-quality planner at the Department of Environmental Quality.
However, federal regulations will require improved diesel-powered
vehicles by 2009 anyway, she said.
"It's immaterial for Oregon, because our rules would not go into effect until 2009," she said.